By P Gosselin on 26.
August 2015
Former NOAA
meteorologist David Dilley has submitted an essay below that has 2 parts: 1)
How the government has been starving researchers who hold alternative opinions
of funding, and 2) climate cycles show we are starting a cooling period.
Readers will recall
that David Dilley is a 40-year meteorology veteran and the producer of the
excellent video: “Is Climate Change Dangerous?“, which
first was presented at NTZ. Since
then the video has been viewed more than 10,000 times and the NTZ story shared
in social media over 800 times.
==================================
Suppressing the Truth – the Next Global Cooling Cycle
By David Dilley,
former NOAA meteorologist
For over 15 years
an inordinate proportion of government and corporate research grants have been
awarded to universities for a single specific purpose: to prove human activities
and the burning of fossil fuels are the main driving mechanisms causing global
warming.
Unfortunately
agendas by strong arm politics and the suppression of contrary views have
become the primary tools used to manipulate the media, local and state
governments (and in turn the general public) into believing what they want us
to believe.
Many former
research department heads, such as Dr. Reid Bryson (known as the Father of
Climatology), openly state that research grants are driven by politics,
and in order to receive a government grant you have to play the game. Topics
for grants go with the political wind.
In the mid 1990s
government grants were typically advertised in such a way to indicate that
conclusions should show a connection to human activity as the cause for
anthropogenic global warming. The result: most of the research published in
journals became one-sided and this became the primary information tool for
media outlets.
According to some
university researchers who were former heads of their departments, if a
university even mentioned natural cycles, they were either denied
future grants, or lost grants. And it is common knowledge that United States
government employees within NOAA were cautioned not to talk about natural
cycles. It is well known that most university research departments live or die
via the grant system. What a great way to manipulate researchers in Europe,
Australia and the United States.
Disinvited, views
suppressed
Not only
governments manipulate, but so do some universities in order to protect their
grants. A perfect example happened in 2012 when I contacted the Eagle
Hill Institute in Steuben Maine USA to see if they would be interested in a
climate change lecture. It should be noted that the institute has very close
ties with the University of Maine. So I indicted that my lecture would involve
information on natural climate cycles, and they responded saying, “That is
fine.” Then In May of 2013 they asked me to speak at their lecture series on
June 29th – an invitation that I accepted. They even consequently
advertised the event and posted it on their online calendar.
All seemed well as
I prepared for the lecture. But then came the manipulation and suppression
of views. Just four days prior to the lecture, three people from the University
of Maine viewed our web site (www.globalweatheroscillations.com). The
next morning, just 3 days prior to the June 29th lecture, I received an email
from Eagle Hill stating that my “lecture is canceled due to a staffing
shortage”. Upon checking their web site, the calendar did show my lecture
as being canceled, but carried the notation that “we hope to have a
different lecture on the 29th”.
So what happened
with the staffing shortage? A news service called “The Maine Wire“ interviewed
the President of Eagle Hill, and he said that the University of Maine “felt
some people in the audience may be uncomfortable hearing Mr. Dilley’s lecture”.
What did they want
to hide from the public?
The IPCC and most
anthropogenic believers want to maintain the belief that global warming during
the past 100 years has been caused by human activity alone, and this is why
most of their climate talks and lectures do not even mention prior global
warming cycles.
The politically
driven United Nations IPCC and United States global warming ruse will likely
end up being one of the greatest scandals of the 21st century. If left
unchecked it will continue to lead the world down a dangerous path that could
jeopardize the lives of millions of people. Many have been led to believe the
earth is heading into catastrophic global warming. Is this a political ruse,
and will it likely blindside governments within the next few years? When it
comes to climate, history does repeat itself.
Cooling has already
begun
Alternating global
warming and cooling cycles have historically occurred and ended like clockwork
every 220 to 230 years, with nearly 4000 cycles occurring during the past half
million years. The last global cooling cycle began around 1795, or about 220
years ago. If the time clock strikes on time as it has over and over again
throughout history, the upcoming cooling cycle has already begun in the Arctic
and Antarctic, as shown in my video, “Is Climate Change Dangerous?”
Earth
has experienced 5 global cooling cycles during the past 1,000 years (soon to be
6). The initial 20 to 40 years of a new global cooling cycle are historically
the coldest period, and associated with the most rapid cooling (see attached
graphic). If a large volcanic eruption occurs during this period, large amounts
of sulfur dioxide will be emitted into the atmosphere with the cooling cycle
being exacerbated by sulfate aerosols floating in the upper atmosphere (www.cas.org/science-connections/volcano). The
sulfate aerosols are highly reflective and can cool the earth for 1 to 3 years,
with the end result being a year of no summer in some regions of the world.
Major volcanoes
during cooling periods
Of the past 5
cooling cycles dating back to 900 AD, 4 were associated with strong volcanic
eruptions during the initial 15 to 25 years of the cooling cycles. The volcanic
explosive index (VEI) for these eruptions were between 5 and 7 on a VEI scale
ranging from 1 to 8. The last occurrence was in 1815, when VEI 6 Tambora
erupted. The combination of this massive volcanic eruption occurring some 15 to
20 years into the new global cooling cycle was instrumental in causing the year
of no summer in 1816. During the next several years, nearly one third of Europe
perished from famine, plague and civil unrest. Back then the earth had a
population of 1 billion to feed; today there are 7 billion.
Similar cooling
cycles and eruptions occurred in the year 1600 when VEI 6 Huaynaputina (Peru)
occurred about 20 years into the new cooling cycle. In 1350 Rangitoto (New
Zealand) about 25 years into a cooling cycle, and in the year 834 Eldgja
(Iceland) a great VEI 6 eruption occurred about 25 years into the new cooling
cycle. The current global warming cycle is now ending.
Shouldn’t
governments around the world be preparing for a major event that is by far more
dangerous than any warming cycle could possibly be
No comments:
Post a Comment