MARS LITTERBUG
Report 231
November 3, 2013
Joseph P. Skipper
J. P. Skipper can be contacted at: jskipper@marsanomalyresearch.com
There is a wide-angle panoramic multimedia
color image strip supposedly of a portion of Mars terrain drawn from MSL Curiosity
data posted at the links below by JPL on behalf of NASA. It is wide laterally
and comes with the ability to on line scroll around as well as zoom in and
out. According to the NASA Photojournal at the link immediately below it is
a mosaic of images taken by Curiosity's Mast Camera while the rover was working
at the "Rocknest" site in October and November 2012.
It is no doubt meant only to be a representative
example of the planet's dry and inhospitable dessert like terrain. The only
trouble for them is that it also contains two small bright and highly reflective
flat round disc shaped objects very similar to each other that stand out sharply
in that terrain.
Even though highly reflective these two objects are small and are not easy
to locate in the image. The one on the right was brought to my attention by
Humberto Reyno of Italy while the one on the left was discovered by me. Humberto
is to be congratulated on being very sharp eyed as well as understanding the
significance of such evidence even though small.
The first image above demonstrates the
location of the first evidence object in the left portion of the image strip
to help any who wish to check it out in the NASA/JPL image link above. The
second image above accomplishes the same thing for the object in the right
portion of the strip.
The above third and fourth images demonstrate
a closer view that is just beginning to show the small left and right disc
evidence objects along with a better view of the context terrain close around
them. Again this should help those wishing to verify this evidence in the
official NASA/JPL material.
By the way, note the object that I have pointed out with a red arrow and question
mark in the upper right portion of the third image. It looks like a skull
or head with some sort of adornment on the top of it. It could be something
like part of a statue or it could just be a rock. The thing is though that
rocky looking debris to the left of it may also suggests the possibility of
a impact strewn field in which may be busted up statue parts. I'm just pointing
it out to you to let you know that I am aware of it. What ever it is, in my
opinion it just isn't definitive enough to be worth putting in a bunch of
time speculating on it. For the time being let's just keep it in mind.
There are other items in this strip that raise the suspicion of being anomalous
including a broken off statue horse's head not shown here but also may just
be rocks with chance configurations familiar to the human eye. If you check
out the official strip, be sure to look for them and see what you think.
The above fifth and sixth images demonstrate
the left and right Curiosity disc shaped evidence at maximum zoom factor allowed
in the official NASA/JPL image strip. As you can see it's not all that good
but then surely you didn't believe you would get more out of NASA material
posted for public consumption despite the advanced camera technology always
officially promoted.
However, it is good enough to see how bright and shiny these two objects are
and even as small as they are how they stand out big time in their surroundings
once located. It should be obvious that these are objects in the terrain and
not native geology or camera or processing artifacts. It should also be obvious
that these objects are perfectly round with very high reflectivity indicating
that both are relatively flat on the upper exposed surface. Note that the
right object is casting a tiny shadow on the near underside further confirming
that it is a physical object laying on the ground.
In other words these objects are obviously artificially machined discs and
likely metal. Beyond that it is speculation whether they are really objects
on the real Mars planetary surface or just part of terrain originally imaged
on Earth to play a role in the Mars Curiosity visual data as an obfuscation
tactic. If they are the latter, then no more needs to be said by me because
they aren't real in the Mar's data and it's just the usual boring secrecy
obfuscation missed by those who applied it.
On the other hand, if they are something real in the Mars terrain, then the
question becomes how did obviously artificially made objects get there on
a world that is not suppose to have such things unless they are incredibly
ancient? But, note that both appear very clean as evidenced by their super
shiny appearance. Even the metal gold
with a flat surface facing the sky would
collect wind blown sediment over time and would eventually collect enough
sediment to blend in with its surroundings if not bury it completely. This
suggests that they are both newly deposited and haven't been laying there
long. Has some of the MSL Curiosity or previous missions equipment fell off
and come to rest here?
with a flat surface facing the sky would
collect wind blown sediment over time and would eventually collect enough
sediment to blend in with its surroundings if not bury it completely. This
suggests that they are both newly deposited and haven't been laying there
long. Has some of the MSL Curiosity or previous missions equipment fell off
and come to rest here?
If not, then we are looking at parts originating from someone else's equipment.
If accidental, then that takes care of that. However, they could have also
been intentionally placed before hand along the anticipated path of the Curiosity
rover to monitor it. I suspect it would be relatively simple to monitor the
rover's communications with Earth to determine where it is directed to go
next and then place interception devises along that expected course. Even
our self absorbed scientists and the secrecy people should be very interested
in such a possibility because of its obvious compromised intelligence implications.
The main reason I am placing emphasis on and reporting on such small items
is because of their implications. There can be little question that this evidence
is artificially made and that it is too clean to have been laying there long.
If it did not come from one of our Mars missions, then it could be proof of
someone here on Earth creating this terrain's details obfuscating what is
really there and making a mistake in the process. The alternative is that
someone on Mars dropped them from their equipment by chance or by intentional
design.
Because someone here on Earth does not want you and I to be considering such
lines of questioning, these are big time heavy implications that we are not
suppose to think about. We are suppose to be compliant and think only about
what has been approved and supplied to us like the idea of ancient water just
below the Mars surface as a resource that Earth's colonial and profit aspirations
can capitalize on not fettered by moral considerations.
There is no definitive answer to these speculations but they are none the
less growing increasingly necessary. It is what happens when military, intelligence,
and secrecy takes over space exploration. It results in trust falling to the
wayside. You secrecy types have no one to blame but yourself.
Joseph P. Skipper, Investigator
No comments:
Post a Comment