Feb. 13 - Scientific Evidence for the Tzolkin Cycle‏

Dear Friends,

Click the link if you don't receive the images/can't access the links.

http://emergent-culture.com/scientific-evidence-for-the-tzolkin-cycle-core-component-of-mayan-calendar-system/

Be Well.

David

Scientific Evidence for the Tzolkin Cycle: Core Component of Mayan Calendar System

Empirical Evidence for the Concurrence of Tzolkin Cycle HYPER-DAYs and Earthquake Frequency-Intensity Spikes over a 6.25 month period starting July 22, 2009 and ending January 31, 2010

The green squares on the Tzolkin chart are the focus of the report you are reading. Graph number 1 starts where the last (260) and first day (1) of the Tzolkin cycle coincide with July 22 and July 23rd respectively. The first consecutive stretch of green squares, column 6 counting from left to right or HYPER-DAY Sequence A is charted in Graph number 3.HYPER-DAY Sequence B is charted in Graph number 4. The last graph charts from square number 164 thru 193. The Tzolkin chart is read from top to bottom following the number sequence from 1 to 260.

I am pleased to announce the first fruits of an effort to provide empirically based scientific data that begins to prove the existence of the enigmatic Tzolkin Cycle, or the core component of the Maya Calendrical system (Mayan Calendar). You will find a series of graphs at the end of this brief introduction that plot the correlation of key Tzolkin Cycle days concurrence with peaks of earthquake frequency and intensity.

The key days are known as HYPER-DAYS and there are 52 such days within the overall 260 day Tzolkin cycle. Please see the Tzolkin chart picture caption for an orientation to HYPER-DAY plotting. This article is a presentation of the graphs themselves. In a few days I will present the complete written analysis. The graphs have legends and texts boxes so they will be legible and much of the overt data points should be ascertainable.

Cleaning House

There are several Tzolkin counts in use by the various schools of Maya calendrics. There can only be one correct Tzolkin count. I refer to the Tzolkin count that I have been tracking and studying for the last 10 years as the Arguellen Account of the Tzolkin (AA). Dr. Jose Arguelles introduced his account of the Tzolkin in his landmark publication “The Mayan Factor” in 1987.

But to my knowledge his account or any other account of the Tzolkin has not been accompanied by empirically based scientific data. Arguelles and others have presented their accounting of the Tzolkin as some obvious self-existing fact, but no one has bothered to offer empirical evidence or even a sound logical argument for why their account or any other accounting is valid and all others invalid.

The New MAC

My work will now begin to empirically validate the AA Tzolkin and thus invalidate all other Tzolkin counts in use. This is an important step in the scientific founding of the Maya-Meso-American Calendrical system (MAC) and in the reconciliation of the Maya-Meso-American Calendrical community.

Tzolkin Cycle and HYPER-DAY Brief

The 52 HYPER-DAYS of the Tzolkin stand out from the all other Tzolkin cycle days by possessing a characteristic that corresponds with the “activity intensification and amplification” of all phenomena, hence the term HYPER-DAY to denote hyper-activity.

The Tzolkin chart… maps what is perhaps the most fundamental cycle of nature. In essence the Tzolkin cycle defines and describes “nature” and its most fundamental processes and characteristics.

The Tzolkin cycle is not easily discernible for only one culture out of the thousands that have lived managed to discover it. It has eluded modern science up to the present moment. Many cultures inclusive of modern science have captured glimpses of the cycle, but it was the ancient cultures of Meso-America (Mexico-Central America) that mapped it out in complete detail.

Like a Phoenix from the Ashes

The European invasion all but obliterated the precolonial knowledge of ancient Meso-America. But fragment by fragment the significance and magnificence of a lost and ancient science is being reconstructed.

For those of you new to my work on the MAC system please review the Synchronicity and 2012 sections of my website. In reference to the specific nature of the report you are now reading please see Critical Junctures, Solar Cycle 2012 and the Global Predicament: Breakthrough and Breakdown? and Tzolkin Cycle HYPER-DAYS, The Haiti Earthquake & Critical Junctures Update #3. For greatest comprehension I recommend reading the former article first.

There is a great deal of information on each graph and without further elaboration some of my notations may not be clear. The most telling feature of the graphs are the spikes of earthquake (Qk) frequency-intensity (FI) that accompanies each HYPER-DAY (HD).

The green squares on the Tzolkin chart are the focus of the report you are reading. Graph number 1 starts where the last (260) and first day (1) of the Tzolkin cycle coincide with July 22 and July 23rd respectively. The first consecutive stretch of green squares, column 6 counting from left to right or HYPER-DAY Sequence A is charted on Graph number 3. HYPER-DAY Sequence B is charted on Graph number 4. The last graph charts from square number 164 thru 193. The Tzolkin chart is read from top to bottom following the number sequence from 1 to 260.

HYPER-DAY WINDOWS

Graphs 1, 2 and 5 chart a total of 23 HYPER-DAYS (HD) spread over 4.25 months and there are 23 unmistakable spikes in activity accompanying what I call a HYPER-DAY WINDOW (HDW).

A HDW is the day before a HD, the day of, and the day after a HD. A surge in earthquake (Qk) frequency and intensity (FI) occurred 100 percent of the time in the samples I have thus far provided.

HYPER-DAY Sequences

I will continue to create more samples… as my research on this aspect of the MAC system has only just begun. Graphs 3 and 4 are different from the other 3 in that the months of November and December 2009 coincided with the two unique stretches of 10 consecutive HD’S termed HYPER-DAY Sequences (HDS).

The impact of the 2 HYPER-DAY Sequences (HDS’s) on the frequency and intensity of earthquakes is less obvious and not as significant as in the other three graphs where the HD’s are sporadically spaced.

Nonetheless each HDS is accompanied by statistically significant oscillations in earthquake (Qk) frequency and intensity (FI) among other aspects. Frequency pertains to the number of quakes per day and intensity refers to the strength of earthquakes as measured on the Richter Magnitude (M) scale.

The evidence allows me to claim that the frequency and intensity of earthquakes tends to spike and cluster in and around HYPER-DAY WINDOWS (HDW’s). You will soon see for yourself that that is indeed the case thus far over the sample six and quarter month period. I obtained my earthquake data from the U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Data Base.

Each data point on the graphs represents the total number of earthquakes recorded worldwide on the specified day and as defined per the 3 categories of earthquake magnitude (M).

Research Highlights

23 of 23 HYPER-DAY Windows were all accompanied by spikes in Earthquake frequency and intensity.

Over the 6.25 month period there were nine quakes over 7.0M and one over 8.0M. The ten strongest quakes of the time sample ALL happened during a HDW.

19 of the 28 strongest quakes over 6.5M happened on a HDW.

Please click on each graph to enlarge otherwise they will be unreadable.

Graph 1:

July 22 thru Aug 31 2009 Earthquake (Q) Frequency-Intensity (FI) Correlation w/ AA Tzolkin Cycle HYPER-DAYs (HD)

Graph 1: July thru August 2009 Correspondence w/ days 260 thru 40 of Arguellen Tzolkin Count. Click to enlarge

Graph 2:

Sep.1 thru Oct 31 2009 Earthquake (Q) Frequency-Intensity

(FI) Correlation w/ AA Tzolkin Cycle HYPER-DAYs (HD)

Graph 2: Sep. thru Oct 2009 Correspondence w/ days 41 thru 101 of Arguellen Tzolkin Count. Click to enlarge

Graph 3:

November 2009 Earthquake (Q) Frequency-Intensity

(FI) Correlation w/ AA Tzolkin Cycle HYPER-DAYs (HD)

Graph 3: November 2009 Correspondence w/ days 102 thru 131 of Arguellen Tzolkin Count. Click to enlarge

Graph 4:

December 2009 Earthquake (Q) Frequency-Intensity

(FI) Correlation w/ AA Tzolkin Cycle HYPER-DAYs (HD)

Graph 4: December 2009 Correspondence w/ days 132 thru 163 of Arguellen Tzolkin Count. Click to enlarge

Graph 5:

January 2010 Earthquake (Q) Frequency-Intensity

(FI) Correlation w/ AA Tzolkin Cycle HYPER-DAYs (HD)

Graph 5: January 2009 Correspondence w/ days 164 thru 193 of Arguellen Tzolkin Count. Click to enlarge

ShareThis

Related posts:

1. Tzolkin Cycle HYPER-DAYS, The Haiti Earthquake and Critical Junctures Update # 3 On Dec. 15th of 2009 I published my second in...
2. Harmonic Deconvergence: Origins of Mayan Calendar Confusion and 2012 Mania–Separating Fact from Fantasy The Argüellen Factor In 1987 Dr. Jose Argüelles burst...
3. The Mayan Calendar and Dec. 21, 2012: The Facts, the Fiction and the Marvels Dear reader if you are encountering Maya calendric and...
4. On the Trail of the Super Organism, The Question of 2012 and the Marvel of Maya Calendrics Mythic & Scientific Investigations into the Nature of Reality &...
5. Introducing Einstein’s Piper: The Tzolkin Code Unveiled and how every Event is a Synchronicity SOS pt. 5 Series Title: The Tzolkin Code and the Science of Synchronicity: ..