http://www.potentiation.net/DNAmonthly/August09.html
Be Well.
David
1. Crisis in Life Sciences
Peter Gariaev
Introduction
To create an organism, two genetic programs are required. The first is geometric, a scheme for designing the body. The second program is in the form of a meaningful text which contains instructions for how to use the first program in order to understand and build the organism.
These programs exist in the form of "DNA videotapes," which are used by the genetic apparatus acting like a biocomputer. When the biocomputer reads these videotapes, sound and light images appear that constitute the "movie program" for the organism's development. When the creation of a grown-up organism is completed, the movie ends. The second movie then starts, complete with instructions for maintenance of the organism for an indefinite period of time.
Unfortunately, the videotapes containing information about a perfectly healthy organism get corrupted over time as errors (DNA mutations) accumulate. The instructions become riddled with errors and the organism gets sick, grows old, and dies.
Our position is that it is very likely that these DNA videotapes can be renewed and corrected. With this new understanding of how our genetic apparatus works, completely new technologies for healing a person and extending a person's life become feasible. This is the essence of "wave-genetics" and its practical applications.
Problems with Mainstream Genetics
The genetic apparatus of every organism on Earth, including humans, consists of chromosomes, where all genetic information, such as DNA and RNA, is stored. The paradigm or "central dogma" of mainstream genetics and molecular biology states that:
1) The genetic apparatus operates as a purely material structure; and
2) All the functions of genetic control of an organism are localized in approximately two percent of DNA, the so-called coding DNA. The remaining ninety-eight percent of the genetic apparatus codes for nothing, and is dismissed as "junk" DNA, which is thought to be a "graveyard" of virus DNA.
Biologists use analogies and metaphors to explain how the genetic apparatus operates. The genetic apparatus with its forty-six chromosomes is viewed as a "library" consisting of forty-six "volumes" or "books." Each book (chromosome) contains a "text" (instructions for building the organism) which consists of "sentences" (DNA) composed of "words" (genes). And each word (gene) consists of four chemical "letters" that make up our "genetic alphabet."
The material manifestations of DNA molecules are the famous double helices, consisting of gene segments. Mainstream molecular science views our genetic texts as written in "DNA language," initially translated by the organism into "RNA language" and then into "protein language."
Not counting water, proteins are the stuff we are mostly made of. Proteins perform two principal functions in the organism: they metabolize substances we eat and participate in morphogenesis, i.e., development of the organism's spatial-temporal organization.
The understanding of genetic composition outlined in this section is based on the activity of the two percent of coding DNA, which is matter and matter only, like a physical book. But the book analogy ends here.
What Mainstream Genetics Cannot Explain
As we all know, huge biological differences distinguishing different species are transmitted from parents to children. In other words, there are sizable genetic differences that automatically obtain in different species. Yet at the same time, genes and proteins are practically the same for all species. This leads to the first unresolved problem with mainstream genetic science: how do we explain the variations in morphogenesis (i.e., the development of organisms) across species?
Simply put, our position is that an organism's genome cannot and does not consist of ninety-eight percent "junk." Such thinking is nonsense from the perspective of evolution, which throws away anything unnecessary.
Embryologists have discovered the existence of special proteins that determine the shape and size of particular parts of the embryo. This very discovery, however, calls attention to a second unresolved problem in today's genetics: namely, how do we explain why some of these specialized proteins are synthesized in one place in an organism, while their action in the form of a command to create a specific structure (a hand, a toe, etc.) often is expressed immediately in another location in the embryo separated from the first location by hundreds of cells?
Experimental Data Challenge Central Dogma of Life Sciences
Over recent decades, a wealth of experimental data has been rapidly accumulating that unambiguously points to significant gaps and inconsistencies in the central dogma of mainstream genetics.
Not only does this new information challenge the prevailing paradigm in life sciences; it also challenges us to rethink and revise the entire premise of our understanding of the nature of life. The highlights of this new data are summarized below.
DNA Phantom Effect
In this research, a DNA sample was moved from one location to another. And yet a trace, a phantom, was detected in the original location of the sample. This phenomenon was registered using the laser spectroscopy method I developed in 1984 in Russia that was replicated by the Pecora group in 1990 in the United States.
While investigating the stability of the DNA phantom, I discovered that after blowing away the phantom with gaseous nitrogen, it always returned within five-eight minutes. Then, after one month, the phantom would disappear completely. It is noteworthy that sound waves radiated by the DNA molecules were registered in these experiments.
In 2005 a group I headed in Russia irradiated DNA samples with electromagnetic fields in certain frequency ranges. As a result, various wave structures were created in the space nearby that were recorded on film. These amazing phantom structures were found to move along complicated trajectories that mimicked the shape of the DNA sample and certain objects surrounding it.
Phantom Leaf Effect
In 1975 Stanislav Adamenko in Russia performed the following experiment. After a part of a living leaf was cut and the remaining part was placed in a high-frequency electromagnetic field, a visual image of the whole leaf appeared.
In other words, a phantom image of the cut part appeared which lived for up to fifteen seconds--long enough to be recorded on film. The experiment was reproduced by my research group and many other laboratories around the world.
Cytopathic "Mirror" Effect
During the period between 1980 to 1990, the group of Vlail Kaznacheev [also written Kaznacheyev] in Russia performed a series of experiments to investigate the following phenomenon.
Two identical cell cultures were placed in hermetically sealed glass containers separated from each other by a quartz barrier. A pathology was introduced into one of these cultures. Within a matter of days, the second cell culture, which was separated physically from the first, displayed the same pathology.
Distant Interaction between Embryos
In 2000 Vladimir Burlakov in Russia discovered the following phenomenon. Two embryos of the same kind of fish in different embryonic stages of development were placed in hermetically sealed glass containers separated from each other by a quartz barrier.
After several weeks, the embryos started to display malformations. Even more interesting was that the types of malformations were dependent on the differences in embryonic stages of development between the two embryos.
Specifically, for the same embryonic stage of one embryo, different embryonic stages of the other induced different malformations in the first embryo. According to the established theory of embryogenesis, and biology in general, any distant interaction between embryos is impossible.
Holographic Transmission & Programming of Genetic Information
In an experiment conducted in Russia in 2000, V. Budakovski recorded a fragment of a tissue of a raspberry plant on a hologram using a red laser and then transmitted the hologram to a raspberry plant tumor (callus). After several months, the callus disappeared and developed into a raspberry plant. Conventional plant science cannot explain these results.
Wave Genes Heal Diabetes in Rats
Three series of experiments in wave-genetics of identical protocol were conducted by my research groups in 2000 in Moscow, Russia; in 2001 in Toronto, Canada; and in 2005 in Nizhni Novgorod, Russia. The goal of these experiments was specifically to test new technology for regenerating a damaged pancreas in rats. The pancreas is an endocrine gland with several vital functions, the major one being production of insulin, a hormone responsible for sugar metabolism.
We can explain the results of these experiments using the following analogy. The aforementioned healthy pancreas contained "DNA movies" with all the necessary genetic information about the healthy form and function of the pancreas. This projectable "morphogenic" information, when beamed into the poisoned rats, programmed their stem cells to regenerate their pancreas glands.
Altogether, approximately ninety percent of all the rats had their pancreas restored and recovered their health. In some of the experiments, the quantum biocomputer was modified to allow successful transmission of the healing information to sick rats at a distance of twenty kilometers. It is important to note that no known (or at least, admitted) biological fields are capable of transmitting such extremely weak signals with such powerful results.
A New Paradigm for Life Sciences
Taken together, the experimental data presented above represents critical evidence that forces us to conclude that some key elements are missing in our current understanding of life. In other words, the Western scientific paradigm is incomplete.
We are now able to articulate an extended paradigm that provides a natural and simple conceptual framework to account for these experiments. Many researchers contributed to this new paradigm, which I merely outline here. It is my hope that the obvious connections between this new paradigm and the hard scientific data referenced above will stimulate research in this exciting new area.
My colleagues and I are guided by a famous principle in the philosophy of science known as the principle of Occam's razor. This principle says that one should always make the simplest possible (minimal) theoretical assumptions to account for new knowledge being incorporated into an existing theory.
My own Wave-based Genome theory (outlined below) is an example of a "minimalist" approach to account for the new experimental data that challenges many of the precepts of mainstream genetic science.
Postulates of the New Paradigm
1) All living organisms consist of two substances: material substance and energy-informational (EI) substance.
2) The key property which distinguishes EI substance, and the corresponding EI field, from all substances and fields known in today's physics is omnipresence. In other words, EI substance is present simultaneously at each point in space of our three-dimensional material world. This means, importantly, that the distance between EI substances of any two material objects in our three-dimensional world is always zero, no matter how far they are located physically from one other.
3) Each living organism exists at two levels: the material level and the EI level.
4) These two levels of an organism are intimately linked and affect, as well as reflect, each other's condition. Moreover, and critically, the EI level is the primary level of existence.
5) We define life as a dynamic exchange of energy and information between a physical organism and its EI (subtle) counterpart.
New Paradigm's Application Explains Anomalous Experimental Data
This extended paradigm for life sciences easily accounts for the anomalous experiments described above. I offer three examples.
DNA Phantom Effect. This experiment can be explained as follows. In the process of taking laser spectroscopy measurements, a laser ray was beamed at the DNA sample. During that time, energy and information were transmitted from the material DNA to its counterpart at the EI level. After the (material) DNA sample was removed, the process of transmission of energy and information was reversed. The DNA sample at the EI level was still in the same location, from where it started sending energy and information back to the physical location from which the material DNA sample had been removed. As result, a DNA phantom was detected.
Distant Interaction between Embryos. This experiment can be interpreted as an exchange of energy and information along the following chain: the first embryo at the material level --> the first embryo at the EI level --> the second embryo at the EI level --> the second embryo at the material level. Obviously, the directions in the chain can be reversed.
Wave Genes Heal Diabetes in Rats. This experiment can be interpreted much like the previous one. To explain so-called transmission of healing energy and information to sick rats at a distance of twenty kilometers without energy expenditure, we only need to recall Postulate 2 (above), which can be extrapolated to mean that the distance between the EI pancreatic DNA videotape in the wave biocomputer databank of a healthy member of the species and the EI pancreatic DNA of the sick rats was zero, and hence we did not need energy to "transmit" anything.
Wave-genetics: A Brief Historical Perspective
The concept of a biological field has been developed by a number of researchers. Due to limited space, we only mention two names. Around 1920 in Russia, Alexander Gurvitch pointed to the necessity for introducing the concept of the biological field relative to chromosomes in order to account for special organization functions in the organism.
More recently, according to Rupert Sheldrake, creation has been compared to a living organism. This ancient concept challenges the notion of the Universe as a mechanism with God as the great mechanic.
Sheldrake's theory of "formative causation" implies a non-mechanistic Universe, governed by laws which themselves are subject to change. The hypothesis of morphic resonance and morphic fields Sheldrake has developed is as an alternative to mechanistic thinking in biology.
The concepts of wave-genetics that I have explored with my colleagues have been nurtured by the existing tradition, which has facilitated many of our breakthroughs in both experimental and theoretical directions.
Basic Principles of Wave-genetics
1) The ninety-eight percent of our DNA dismissed by mainstream genetics as "junk" is anything but, being rather a set of supercodes of a higher level than those coding RNA and proteins. This higher level is the "wave level."
2) The genome is a quasi-intelligent system.
3) The function of the wave level of genetic coding is to program the spatial-temporal organization of the organism.
Traditionally, when geneticists refer to DNA, RNA and proteins, they reference their speech and texts only. As mentioned above, the standard linguistic structures of the genome are recognized at the material level in the form of sequences of chemical letters in a DNA chain consisting of the two percent of coding DNA.
In wave-genetics, by contrast, these texts are understood to exist at the material level in the form of sophisticated dynamic holograms (gene-holograms) in the liquid crystals of the chromosome continuum.
DNA Wave Biocomputer
Short-term information on gene-holograms is the result of interference, recorded by intercellular water structures, of spatial light and sound images relative to the current condition of cells. These images are read by the light and sound radiations of chromosomes, then transmitted to neighboring cells, informing them as to the condition of the cell sending the information.
Such an operation is performed by each cell in the organism, and there a billions of such cells. In this way, all cells in the organism form a combined unified informational space, which functions like a DNA wave biocomputer. This biocomputer processes, in real time, information about metabolic events and situations in cells.
Another type of bioholographic information is of a morphogenetic nature, and therefore is inherited and fixed for a particular organism, changing only very slowly over time in the process of evolution.
The DNA wave biocomputer is a quasi-intelligent system operating with its own languages, similar to human ones, which we are only beginning to understand. The linguistic structures of the genome at this level are true speech and true texts. By this, we mean that quasi-intelligent decisions are made here regarding regulation of the structure and functions of the organism.
The Genome: A Quasi-intelligent System
Classical genetics has discovered experimentally that RNA texts contain ambiguous words (homonyms) which may have more than one meaning, and that the choice of the meaning is determined by the context.
The true significance of this discovery, which was overlooked by genetics, is that these homonyms code critically significant molecules: proteins. If such a word-code has two meanings, and one of them is wrong for creation of a particular required protein, this might result in a biochemical accident and death of the organism.
For example, in English the word "ring" can code for at least two different meanings: "a circle" and "a place of competition" (for boxers). In order to give the precise and unique meaning to a homonym, the genetic apparatus first must comprehend the meaning of the RNA text.
Only then is the decision made as to which precise meaning to give the homonym. This example clearly illustrates that the genetic apparatus has quasi-intelligence and is capable of quasi-thinking at the molecular as well as the genome-biocomputer levels.
Wave-genetics Explains Puzzling Everyday Phenomena
Telegony. This is a phenomenon known to occur among both animals and humans which cannot be explained from the perspective of classical genetics. Telegony occurs when a female has her first sexual encounter and then years later gives birth to a child, from another male, having genetic characteristics of her first sexual partner.
For example, a white woman who first had sexual intercourse with a black man may later give birth to a mixed-race baby fathered by a white man. Wave-genetics considers this a real-life example of the DNA Phantom Effect and a striking confirmation of wave-genetics principles. In the foregoing case, the first male leaves his wave signature or "imprints" his DNA phantom (which appears more powerful than that of the second male) in the genetic apparatus of the female.
Post-abortion "Labor." A similar explanation is apparently valid when a woman following an abortion experiences "birth contractions" around the ninth-month of her terminated pregnancy. A plausible explanation is that the aborted embryo leaves its DNA phantom in the mother's womb.
Perspectives
We now have a paradoxical situation in genetics, molecular biology, and medicine in general, that is both grave and promising at once. Long ago, science decided to investigate the genetic code of human beings and recently completed this ten-year-long effort, called the Human Genome Project, of mapping the DNA sequences of our species. All the letters and sequences of our DNA codes are now known.
Thanks to these results, the forces of transgenetic engineering have been gathering momentum. Already, scientists have introduced artificial gene sequences into plants, animals and bacteria, which are being used as carriers of these artificially introduced genes. Such experiments have been thought to hold great potential for human health applications, promising possible cures for many diseases and disabilities and the creation of disease-resistant foods.
Paradoxically, the more success we have with such technologies, the further we seem to be from understanding the actual foundational principles, the inner workings, of the genetic code. So far, successes in this area have been mainly concerned with functions of particular gene sequences that fabricate various proteins. These gene sequences comprise only two percent of the genetic memory found in chromosomes.
The other ninety-eight percent, the major part of chromosomes, as explained above, is almost completely misunderstood by mainstream genetics. To ignore, or so poorly understand, the role of this ninety-eight percent of the human genome is an appreciable error.
With our present accepted understanding of genetics, we cannot cure cancer, we cannot resist AIDS, we have not defeated tuberculosis, nor can we prolong significantly the lives of people. The initial promises of a bright future, based on the creations of transgenetic research, have turned out to be empty, producing only dangerous foods that are hazardous to our biosphere on which our very lives depend. The cloning of animals has produced only ugly and useless creatures, or animals that grow old and die abnormally quickly, as in the well-known case of the cloned sheep, Dolly. And it is quite natural that these results cause alarm within the scientific community.
The essence of our ideas on wave-genetics, which have already found a number of practical applications, proceed from very simple strategic reasoning. In order to achieve success in our attempts to treat various medical problems and slow the processes of human aging, it is clearly necessary to understand the languages by which cells communicate with each other. We have managed to accomplish this, to some extent, by grasping that the languages we were looking for are, in fact, contained in the very DNA mainstream genetic science has chosen to ignore.
The basic principle of these languages is similar to the language of holographic images based on principles of laser radiation of genetic structures. It is particularly important to realize that at the EI level, our genetic apparatus actually performs real processes that guide and supplement the otherwise observable activity of the three-part genetic code.
At what stage of development is our new knowledge and what can it bring us? We are making the first steps in investigating the mechanisms of the physical processes, and developing mathematical descriptions of the informational processes, that occur in genetic structures. We have produced laboratory equipment that allows us to accurately model the informational functions of the living cell and its DNA.
Such devices represent the first quantum biocomputers. These devices have allowed us to carry out distant transfers of genetic/metabolic information; introduce this information into a biosystem-acceptor; and perform strategic management functions of biosystems, biochemical systems, and actual physiological conditions.
Most significantly, through wave-genetics, as described above, we have found it is possible to regenerate endocrine glands in animals, and the same approach seems to promise a considerably slower aging process in humans.
To create an organism, two genetic programs are required. The first is geometric, a scheme for designing the body. The second program is in the form of a meaningful text which contains instructions for how to use the first program in order to understand and build the organism.
These programs exist in the form of "DNA videotapes," which are used by the genetic apparatus acting like a biocomputer. When the biocomputer reads these videotapes, sound and light images appear that constitute the "movie program" for the organism's development. When the creation of a grown-up organism is completed, the movie ends. The second movie then starts, complete with instructions for maintenance of the organism for an indefinite period of time.
Unfortunately, the videotapes containing information about a perfectly healthy organism get corrupted over time as errors (DNA mutations) accumulate. The instructions become riddled with errors and the organism gets sick, grows old, and dies.
Our position is that it is very likely that these DNA videotapes can be renewed and corrected. With this new understanding of how our genetic apparatus works, completely new technologies for healing a person and extending a person's life become feasible. This is the essence of "wave-genetics" and its practical applications.
Problems with Mainstream Genetics
The genetic apparatus of every organism on Earth, including humans, consists of chromosomes, where all genetic information, such as DNA and RNA, is stored. The paradigm or "central dogma" of mainstream genetics and molecular biology states that:
1) The genetic apparatus operates as a purely material structure; and
2) All the functions of genetic control of an organism are localized in approximately two percent of DNA, the so-called coding DNA. The remaining ninety-eight percent of the genetic apparatus codes for nothing, and is dismissed as "junk" DNA, which is thought to be a "graveyard" of virus DNA.
Biologists use analogies and metaphors to explain how the genetic apparatus operates. The genetic apparatus with its forty-six chromosomes is viewed as a "library" consisting of forty-six "volumes" or "books." Each book (chromosome) contains a "text" (instructions for building the organism) which consists of "sentences" (DNA) composed of "words" (genes). And each word (gene) consists of four chemical "letters" that make up our "genetic alphabet."
The material manifestations of DNA molecules are the famous double helices, consisting of gene segments. Mainstream molecular science views our genetic texts as written in "DNA language," initially translated by the organism into "RNA language" and then into "protein language."
Not counting water, proteins are the stuff we are mostly made of. Proteins perform two principal functions in the organism: they metabolize substances we eat and participate in morphogenesis, i.e., development of the organism's spatial-temporal organization.
The understanding of genetic composition outlined in this section is based on the activity of the two percent of coding DNA, which is matter and matter only, like a physical book. But the book analogy ends here.
What Mainstream Genetics Cannot Explain
As we all know, huge biological differences distinguishing different species are transmitted from parents to children. In other words, there are sizable genetic differences that automatically obtain in different species. Yet at the same time, genes and proteins are practically the same for all species. This leads to the first unresolved problem with mainstream genetic science: how do we explain the variations in morphogenesis (i.e., the development of organisms) across species?
Simply put, our position is that an organism's genome cannot and does not consist of ninety-eight percent "junk." Such thinking is nonsense from the perspective of evolution, which throws away anything unnecessary.
Embryologists have discovered the existence of special proteins that determine the shape and size of particular parts of the embryo. This very discovery, however, calls attention to a second unresolved problem in today's genetics: namely, how do we explain why some of these specialized proteins are synthesized in one place in an organism, while their action in the form of a command to create a specific structure (a hand, a toe, etc.) often is expressed immediately in another location in the embryo separated from the first location by hundreds of cells?
Experimental Data Challenge Central Dogma of Life Sciences
Over recent decades, a wealth of experimental data has been rapidly accumulating that unambiguously points to significant gaps and inconsistencies in the central dogma of mainstream genetics.
Not only does this new information challenge the prevailing paradigm in life sciences; it also challenges us to rethink and revise the entire premise of our understanding of the nature of life. The highlights of this new data are summarized below.
DNA Phantom Effect
In this research, a DNA sample was moved from one location to another. And yet a trace, a phantom, was detected in the original location of the sample. This phenomenon was registered using the laser spectroscopy method I developed in 1984 in Russia that was replicated by the Pecora group in 1990 in the United States.
While investigating the stability of the DNA phantom, I discovered that after blowing away the phantom with gaseous nitrogen, it always returned within five-eight minutes. Then, after one month, the phantom would disappear completely. It is noteworthy that sound waves radiated by the DNA molecules were registered in these experiments.
In 2005 a group I headed in Russia irradiated DNA samples with electromagnetic fields in certain frequency ranges. As a result, various wave structures were created in the space nearby that were recorded on film. These amazing phantom structures were found to move along complicated trajectories that mimicked the shape of the DNA sample and certain objects surrounding it.
Phantom Leaf Effect
In 1975 Stanislav Adamenko in Russia performed the following experiment. After a part of a living leaf was cut and the remaining part was placed in a high-frequency electromagnetic field, a visual image of the whole leaf appeared.
In other words, a phantom image of the cut part appeared which lived for up to fifteen seconds--long enough to be recorded on film. The experiment was reproduced by my research group and many other laboratories around the world.
Cytopathic "Mirror" Effect
During the period between 1980 to 1990, the group of Vlail Kaznacheev [also written Kaznacheyev] in Russia performed a series of experiments to investigate the following phenomenon.
Two identical cell cultures were placed in hermetically sealed glass containers separated from each other by a quartz barrier. A pathology was introduced into one of these cultures. Within a matter of days, the second cell culture, which was separated physically from the first, displayed the same pathology.
Distant Interaction between Embryos
In 2000 Vladimir Burlakov in Russia discovered the following phenomenon. Two embryos of the same kind of fish in different embryonic stages of development were placed in hermetically sealed glass containers separated from each other by a quartz barrier.
After several weeks, the embryos started to display malformations. Even more interesting was that the types of malformations were dependent on the differences in embryonic stages of development between the two embryos.
Specifically, for the same embryonic stage of one embryo, different embryonic stages of the other induced different malformations in the first embryo. According to the established theory of embryogenesis, and biology in general, any distant interaction between embryos is impossible.
Holographic Transmission & Programming of Genetic Information
In an experiment conducted in Russia in 2000, V. Budakovski recorded a fragment of a tissue of a raspberry plant on a hologram using a red laser and then transmitted the hologram to a raspberry plant tumor (callus). After several months, the callus disappeared and developed into a raspberry plant. Conventional plant science cannot explain these results.
Wave Genes Heal Diabetes in Rats
Three series of experiments in wave-genetics of identical protocol were conducted by my research groups in 2000 in Moscow, Russia; in 2001 in Toronto, Canada; and in 2005 in Nizhni Novgorod, Russia. The goal of these experiments was specifically to test new technology for regenerating a damaged pancreas in rats. The pancreas is an endocrine gland with several vital functions, the major one being production of insulin, a hormone responsible for sugar metabolism.
A control group of rats was injected with a lethal dose of a poison called alloxan that destroys the pancreas. As a result, all the rats in the control group died from diabetes within four days. Then the same lethal dose of alloxan was injected into another group of rats. When this latter group reached critical condition, they were exposed to light images/waves from our quantum biocomputer. These light images/waves had been created beforehand when the biocomputer read information from a pancreas that had been surgically removed from a healthy newborn rat of the same species.
We can explain the results of these experiments using the following analogy. The aforementioned healthy pancreas contained "DNA movies" with all the necessary genetic information about the healthy form and function of the pancreas. This projectable "morphogenic" information, when beamed into the poisoned rats, programmed their stem cells to regenerate their pancreas glands.
Altogether, approximately ninety percent of all the rats had their pancreas restored and recovered their health. In some of the experiments, the quantum biocomputer was modified to allow successful transmission of the healing information to sick rats at a distance of twenty kilometers. It is important to note that no known (or at least, admitted) biological fields are capable of transmitting such extremely weak signals with such powerful results.
A New Paradigm for Life Sciences
Taken together, the experimental data presented above represents critical evidence that forces us to conclude that some key elements are missing in our current understanding of life. In other words, the Western scientific paradigm is incomplete.
We are now able to articulate an extended paradigm that provides a natural and simple conceptual framework to account for these experiments. Many researchers contributed to this new paradigm, which I merely outline here. It is my hope that the obvious connections between this new paradigm and the hard scientific data referenced above will stimulate research in this exciting new area.
My colleagues and I are guided by a famous principle in the philosophy of science known as the principle of Occam's razor. This principle says that one should always make the simplest possible (minimal) theoretical assumptions to account for new knowledge being incorporated into an existing theory.
My own Wave-based Genome theory (outlined below) is an example of a "minimalist" approach to account for the new experimental data that challenges many of the precepts of mainstream genetic science.
Postulates of the New Paradigm
1) All living organisms consist of two substances: material substance and energy-informational (EI) substance.
2) The key property which distinguishes EI substance, and the corresponding EI field, from all substances and fields known in today's physics is omnipresence. In other words, EI substance is present simultaneously at each point in space of our three-dimensional material world. This means, importantly, that the distance between EI substances of any two material objects in our three-dimensional world is always zero, no matter how far they are located physically from one other.
3) Each living organism exists at two levels: the material level and the EI level.
4) These two levels of an organism are intimately linked and affect, as well as reflect, each other's condition. Moreover, and critically, the EI level is the primary level of existence.
5) We define life as a dynamic exchange of energy and information between a physical organism and its EI (subtle) counterpart.
New Paradigm's Application Explains Anomalous Experimental Data
This extended paradigm for life sciences easily accounts for the anomalous experiments described above. I offer three examples.
DNA Phantom Effect. This experiment can be explained as follows. In the process of taking laser spectroscopy measurements, a laser ray was beamed at the DNA sample. During that time, energy and information were transmitted from the material DNA to its counterpart at the EI level. After the (material) DNA sample was removed, the process of transmission of energy and information was reversed. The DNA sample at the EI level was still in the same location, from where it started sending energy and information back to the physical location from which the material DNA sample had been removed. As result, a DNA phantom was detected.
Distant Interaction between Embryos. This experiment can be interpreted as an exchange of energy and information along the following chain: the first embryo at the material level --> the first embryo at the EI level --> the second embryo at the EI level --> the second embryo at the material level. Obviously, the directions in the chain can be reversed.
Wave Genes Heal Diabetes in Rats. This experiment can be interpreted much like the previous one. To explain so-called transmission of healing energy and information to sick rats at a distance of twenty kilometers without energy expenditure, we only need to recall Postulate 2 (above), which can be extrapolated to mean that the distance between the EI pancreatic DNA videotape in the wave biocomputer databank of a healthy member of the species and the EI pancreatic DNA of the sick rats was zero, and hence we did not need energy to "transmit" anything.
Wave-genetics: A Brief Historical Perspective
The concept of a biological field has been developed by a number of researchers. Due to limited space, we only mention two names. Around 1920 in Russia, Alexander Gurvitch pointed to the necessity for introducing the concept of the biological field relative to chromosomes in order to account for special organization functions in the organism.
More recently, according to Rupert Sheldrake, creation has been compared to a living organism. This ancient concept challenges the notion of the Universe as a mechanism with God as the great mechanic.
Sheldrake's theory of "formative causation" implies a non-mechanistic Universe, governed by laws which themselves are subject to change. The hypothesis of morphic resonance and morphic fields Sheldrake has developed is as an alternative to mechanistic thinking in biology.
The concepts of wave-genetics that I have explored with my colleagues have been nurtured by the existing tradition, which has facilitated many of our breakthroughs in both experimental and theoretical directions.
Basic Principles of Wave-genetics
1) The ninety-eight percent of our DNA dismissed by mainstream genetics as "junk" is anything but, being rather a set of supercodes of a higher level than those coding RNA and proteins. This higher level is the "wave level."
2) The genome is a quasi-intelligent system.
3) The function of the wave level of genetic coding is to program the spatial-temporal organization of the organism.
Traditionally, when geneticists refer to DNA, RNA and proteins, they reference their speech and texts only. As mentioned above, the standard linguistic structures of the genome are recognized at the material level in the form of sequences of chemical letters in a DNA chain consisting of the two percent of coding DNA.
In wave-genetics, by contrast, these texts are understood to exist at the material level in the form of sophisticated dynamic holograms (gene-holograms) in the liquid crystals of the chromosome continuum.
DNA Wave Biocomputer
Short-term information on gene-holograms is the result of interference, recorded by intercellular water structures, of spatial light and sound images relative to the current condition of cells. These images are read by the light and sound radiations of chromosomes, then transmitted to neighboring cells, informing them as to the condition of the cell sending the information.
Such an operation is performed by each cell in the organism, and there a billions of such cells. In this way, all cells in the organism form a combined unified informational space, which functions like a DNA wave biocomputer. This biocomputer processes, in real time, information about metabolic events and situations in cells.
Another type of bioholographic information is of a morphogenetic nature, and therefore is inherited and fixed for a particular organism, changing only very slowly over time in the process of evolution.
The DNA wave biocomputer is a quasi-intelligent system operating with its own languages, similar to human ones, which we are only beginning to understand. The linguistic structures of the genome at this level are true speech and true texts. By this, we mean that quasi-intelligent decisions are made here regarding regulation of the structure and functions of the organism.
The Genome: A Quasi-intelligent System
Classical genetics has discovered experimentally that RNA texts contain ambiguous words (homonyms) which may have more than one meaning, and that the choice of the meaning is determined by the context.
The true significance of this discovery, which was overlooked by genetics, is that these homonyms code critically significant molecules: proteins. If such a word-code has two meanings, and one of them is wrong for creation of a particular required protein, this might result in a biochemical accident and death of the organism.
For example, in English the word "ring" can code for at least two different meanings: "a circle" and "a place of competition" (for boxers). In order to give the precise and unique meaning to a homonym, the genetic apparatus first must comprehend the meaning of the RNA text.
Only then is the decision made as to which precise meaning to give the homonym. This example clearly illustrates that the genetic apparatus has quasi-intelligence and is capable of quasi-thinking at the molecular as well as the genome-biocomputer levels.
Wave-genetics Explains Puzzling Everyday Phenomena
Telegony. This is a phenomenon known to occur among both animals and humans which cannot be explained from the perspective of classical genetics. Telegony occurs when a female has her first sexual encounter and then years later gives birth to a child, from another male, having genetic characteristics of her first sexual partner.
For example, a white woman who first had sexual intercourse with a black man may later give birth to a mixed-race baby fathered by a white man. Wave-genetics considers this a real-life example of the DNA Phantom Effect and a striking confirmation of wave-genetics principles. In the foregoing case, the first male leaves his wave signature or "imprints" his DNA phantom (which appears more powerful than that of the second male) in the genetic apparatus of the female.
Post-abortion "Labor." A similar explanation is apparently valid when a woman following an abortion experiences "birth contractions" around the ninth-month of her terminated pregnancy. A plausible explanation is that the aborted embryo leaves its DNA phantom in the mother's womb.
Perspectives
We now have a paradoxical situation in genetics, molecular biology, and medicine in general, that is both grave and promising at once. Long ago, science decided to investigate the genetic code of human beings and recently completed this ten-year-long effort, called the Human Genome Project, of mapping the DNA sequences of our species. All the letters and sequences of our DNA codes are now known.
Thanks to these results, the forces of transgenetic engineering have been gathering momentum. Already, scientists have introduced artificial gene sequences into plants, animals and bacteria, which are being used as carriers of these artificially introduced genes. Such experiments have been thought to hold great potential for human health applications, promising possible cures for many diseases and disabilities and the creation of disease-resistant foods.
Paradoxically, the more success we have with such technologies, the further we seem to be from understanding the actual foundational principles, the inner workings, of the genetic code. So far, successes in this area have been mainly concerned with functions of particular gene sequences that fabricate various proteins. These gene sequences comprise only two percent of the genetic memory found in chromosomes.
The other ninety-eight percent, the major part of chromosomes, as explained above, is almost completely misunderstood by mainstream genetics. To ignore, or so poorly understand, the role of this ninety-eight percent of the human genome is an appreciable error.
With our present accepted understanding of genetics, we cannot cure cancer, we cannot resist AIDS, we have not defeated tuberculosis, nor can we prolong significantly the lives of people. The initial promises of a bright future, based on the creations of transgenetic research, have turned out to be empty, producing only dangerous foods that are hazardous to our biosphere on which our very lives depend. The cloning of animals has produced only ugly and useless creatures, or animals that grow old and die abnormally quickly, as in the well-known case of the cloned sheep, Dolly. And it is quite natural that these results cause alarm within the scientific community.
The essence of our ideas on wave-genetics, which have already found a number of practical applications, proceed from very simple strategic reasoning. In order to achieve success in our attempts to treat various medical problems and slow the processes of human aging, it is clearly necessary to understand the languages by which cells communicate with each other. We have managed to accomplish this, to some extent, by grasping that the languages we were looking for are, in fact, contained in the very DNA mainstream genetic science has chosen to ignore.
The basic principle of these languages is similar to the language of holographic images based on principles of laser radiation of genetic structures. It is particularly important to realize that at the EI level, our genetic apparatus actually performs real processes that guide and supplement the otherwise observable activity of the three-part genetic code.
At what stage of development is our new knowledge and what can it bring us? We are making the first steps in investigating the mechanisms of the physical processes, and developing mathematical descriptions of the informational processes, that occur in genetic structures. We have produced laboratory equipment that allows us to accurately model the informational functions of the living cell and its DNA.
Such devices represent the first quantum biocomputers. These devices have allowed us to carry out distant transfers of genetic/metabolic information; introduce this information into a biosystem-acceptor; and perform strategic management functions of biosystems, biochemical systems, and actual physiological conditions.
Most significantly, through wave-genetics, as described above, we have found it is possible to regenerate endocrine glands in animals, and the same approach seems to promise a considerably slower aging process in humans.
Copyright (c) 2009 by Peter Gariaev. All Rights Reserved.
[Peter Gariaev, Ph.D., is considered the founder of the new science of wave-genetics and the discover of the fascinating phenomenon known as the "DNA Phantom Effect." He is the Director of the Wave-genetics Institute of Moscow and can be contacted at the following email addresses: gariaev@mail.ru and signmean@gmail.com. Your financial support of his revolutionary research is greatly encouraged and appreciated by the Editor.]
[Peter Gariaev, Ph.D., is considered the founder of the new science of wave-genetics and the discover of the fascinating phenomenon known as the "DNA Phantom Effect." He is the Director of the Wave-genetics Institute of Moscow and can be contacted at the following email addresses: gariaev@mail.ru and signmean@gmail.com. Your financial support of his revolutionary research is greatly encouraged and appreciated by the Editor.]
No comments:
Post a Comment